Live chess broadcast powered by ChessBomb and Chessdom
by noreply@blogger.com (Susan Polgar) at May 17, 2012 06:00 PM
by noreply@blogger.com (Susan Polgar) at May 17, 2012 04:15 PM
by noreply@blogger.com (Susan Polgar) at May 17, 2012 04:12 PM

by noreply@blogger.com (Susan Polgar) at May 17, 2012 01:04 PM
Live chess broadcast powered by ChessBomb and Chessdom
by noreply@blogger.com (Susan Polgar) at May 17, 2012 10:55 AM

by noreply@blogger.com (Susan Polgar) at May 17, 2012 10:54 AM
by noreply@blogger.com (Susan Polgar) at May 17, 2012 06:31 AM

by noreply@blogger.com (Susan Polgar) at May 17, 2012 05:54 AM

The 20th edition of the Sigeman Chess Tournament was organized by Limhamn Chess Club on 9-16th May in Malmö, Sweden.
This year the event had a round robin format with eight players. The additional sponsorship boosted the level of the tournament which featured the strongest lineup ever.
The Italian champion Fabiano Caruana won the competition with an excellent score of 5.5/7 points, leaving the main contender Peter Leko of Hungary half a point behind.
Leko followed the strong pace imposed by the leader and his last-round victory against the over-ambitious Li Chao put some pressure on Caruana. The Italian, however, confidently outplayed Jonny Hector and preserved the top position.
The local hope Nils Grandelius was in the mix for the top two places until he lost to the future tournament winner.
Replay all games with computer analysis
Final standings:
1. GM Caruana Fabiano ITA 2770 – 5.5
2. GM Leko Peter HUN 2723 – 5
3-4. GM Grandelius Nils SWE 2556 and GM Giri Anish NED 2693 – 4
5. GM Li Chao CHN 2703 – 3
6. GM Tikkanen Hans SWE 2566 – 2.5
7-8. GM Berg Emanuel SWE 2587 and GM Hector Jonny SWE 2560 – 2
by noreply@blogger.com (Susan Polgar) at May 17, 2012 05:50 AM

If you will be in New Orleans long enough to experience some of the wonderful culture that the city has to offer, may we suggest some of the following tours:
by noreply@blogger.com (Susan Polgar) at May 17, 2012 05:02 AM

| Rk | Name | Rating | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GM Nakamura, Hikaru | 2775 | x | ½ | ½ | ½ | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ½ | 6.0 | |||
| 2 | GM Kamsky, Gata | 2741 | x | 1 | 1 | ½ | 1 | ½ | 0 | 1 | 1 | 6.0 | |||
| 3 | GM Onischuk, Alexander | 2660 | ½ | 0 | x | ½ | ½ | ½ | 1 | 1 | ½ | 4.5 | |||
| 4 | GM Akobian, Varuzhan | 2625 | ½ | 0 | x | ½ | ½ | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4.5 | |||
| 5 | GM Shulman, Yuri | 2571 | ½ | ½ | ½ | x | ½ | ½ | 1 | ½ | ½ | 4.5 | |||
| 6 | GM Lenderman, Aleksandr | 2587 | 0 | ½ | ½ | ½ | x | 1 | ½ | ½ | ½ | 4.0 | |||
| 7 | GM Robson, Ray | 2614 | 0 | ½ | ½ | 0 | x | ½ | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3.5 | |||
| 8 | GM Kaidanov, Gregory S | 2594 | 0 | 1 | ½ | ½ | ½ | x | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3.5 | |||
| 9 | GM Seirawan, Yasser | 2643 | ½ | 0 | 0 | ½ | 1 | x | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3.0 | |||
| 10 | GM Hess, Robert L | 2635 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ½ | 0 | 1 | 1 | x | ½ | 3.0 | |||
| 11 | GM Stripunsky, Alexander | 2562 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | ½ | ½ | 0 | 1 | x | 3.0 | |||
| 12 | GM Ramirez, Alejandro | 2593 | ½ | 0 | ½ | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | ½ | x | 2.5 |
| Rk | Name | Rating | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | IM Zatonskih, Anna | 2510 | x | ½ | ½ | ½ | ½ | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5.0 | ||
| 2 | IM Krush, Irina | 2457 | ½ | x | ½ | 1 | 1 | ½ | 1 | ½ | 5.0 | ||
| 3 | IM Goletiani, Rusudan | 2333 | ½ | x | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4.5 | ||
| 4 | WGM Foisor, Sabina-Francesca | 2364 | ½ | 0 | 1 | x | 0 | 1 | 1 | ½ | 4.0 | ||
| 5 | WGM Abrahamyan, Tatev | 2329 | 0 | 0 | 1 | x | ½ | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3.5 | ||
| 6 | FM Melekhina, Alisa | 2242 | ½ | ½ | 0 | 0 | x | ½ | 1 | 1 | 3.5 | ||
| 7 | WIM Ni, Viktorija | 2228 | ½ | 0 | 1 | ½ | x | 0 | 1 | ½ | 3.5 | ||
| 8 | WIM Zenyuk, Iryna | 2224 | 0 | ½ | 0 | 1 | ½ | 1 | x | ½ | 3.5 | ||
| 9 | WFM Kats, Alena | 2137 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ½ | x | 1 | 1.5 | ||
| 10 | WGM Baginskaite, Camilla | 2358 | 0 | 0 | ½ | 0 | 0 | ½ | 0 | x | 1.0 |
by noreply@blogger.com (Susan Polgar) at May 17, 2012 12:58 AM
by noreply@blogger.com (Online Chess) at May 17, 2012 12:41 AM

| 1 | GM Seirawan, Yasser | 2.5 | 2643 | - GM Onischuk, Alexander | 4.0 | 2660 | |
| 2 | GM Kaidanov, Gregory S | 3.0 | 2594 | - GM Robson, Ray | 3.0 | 2614 | |
| 3 | GM Akobian, Varuzhan | 3.5 | 2625 | - GM Ramirez, Alejandro | 2.5 | 2593 | |
| 4 | GM Shulman, Yuri | 4.0 | 2571 | - GM Hess, Robert L | 2.5 | 2635 | |
| 5 | GM Stripunsky, Alexander | 3.0 | 2562 | - GM Nakamura, Hikaru | 5.0 | 2775 | |
| 6 | GM Lenderman, Aleksandr | 4.0 | 2587 | - GM Kamsky, Gata | 5.0 | 2741 |
by noreply@blogger.com (Susan Polgar) at May 16, 2012 05:27 PM

| 1. | Caruana, Fabiano | g | ITA | 2770 | 5½ |
| 2. | Leko, Peter | g | HUN | 2723 | 5 |
| 3. | Giri, Anish | g | NED | 2693 | 4 |
| 4. | Grandelius, Nils | g | SWE | 2556 | 4 |
| 5. | Li, Chao | g | CHN | 2703 | 3 |
| 6. | Tikkanen, Hans | g | SWE | 2566 | 2½ |
| 7. | Hector, Jonny | g | SWE | 2560 | 2 |
| 8. | Berg, Emanuel | g | SWE | 2587 | 2 |
by noreply@blogger.com (Susan Polgar) at May 16, 2012 05:16 PM
Dramatic finishes punctuated an unpredictable day at the 2012 U.S. Championship and U.S. Women’s Championship. When the final pawn was captured, a 101-move game ended in king versus king. In both events a pair of trailing players caught up to the leaders.
IM Anna Zatonskih got the better of WIM Iryna Zenyuk in a bishop-and-pawn endgame. With weaknesses on both sides of the board, Zatonskih had no trouble infiltrating and clearing a path for her pawns.
Entering the day behind by one-half point, the win nearly gave Zatonskih sole possession of the lead, as tournament leader IM Irina Krush got all she could handle from IM Rusudan Goletiani. In an atypical affair where Krush’s king voluntarily moved to f1 and Goletiani’s knights occupied f8 and h8, both players thought they were better. “Once the knights come out, my advantage is not permanent,” Krush said.
Krush was caught off guard by the sacrifice 35…Nxf3. Afterward, she expected the immediate material equalization 36…e4, but instead the initiative-minded Goletiani preferred to step up the pressure by making a battery on the f-file. Krush survived the onslaught largely by ignoring it. Her counterattack was just enough to force a repetition of position.
The top two rated women will face off tomorrow. In what has become their usual yearly battle, they enter the game tied for first with 4.5/6. Neither woman has lost a game. “Good thing I didn’t ruin everything today,” Krush said. “It was sharp; anything could have happened.”
The story repeated in the U.S. Championship, where tournament front-runner GM Hikaru Nakamura tried everything he could but could only draw against GM Yury Shulman. This allowed defending champion GM Gata Kamsky to catch up, as he was able to overcome the blockade of GM Alex Stripunsky.
Nakamura and Shulman played the longest game of the tournament. After five and a half hours and 101 moves, they were down to just their kings. After fruitlessly trying for more than 60 moves to win with an extra kingside pawn, Nakamura looked across the room for much of the final moves, seemingly chastising himself for missed opportunities.
Shulman guessed that he was unhappy the minor pieces were allowed to be traded after 77…Be6+. Thanks to the zwischenzug 78…Re5+, Shulman entered an easily drawing rook-and-pawn endgame. Still, he insisted that the ending is drawn even without the “petite combinaison.” Nakamura has still never defeated Shulman in a tournament game.
Shulman’s staunch defense, coupled with the tenacity of Kamsky to find a way to clear the path for his hanging pawns, means Nakamura and Kamsky are now equal first with 5/7. They will not meet until Friday’s penultimate round ten.
Stripunsky and Kamsky had drawn many previous games, but today Kamsky won for the first time ever in classical chess, though he had won a rapid game in 2006. After a lot of circular movement, Kamsky made the time control and got his c- and d-pawns moving. In the final position, he had promoted a second queen, with one more on the way.
The most entertaining game of the day was unequivocally GM Alejandro Ramirez against GM Gregory Kaidanov. After a stunning victory, Ramirez was still trying to collect himself and figure out what happened. “This game was crazy,” he said. With arrows and variations strewn haphazardly all over the computer screen in the commentary room, Ramirez offered what he knew about the game, and what he was still sorting out. “I was just trying to get to the time control alive,” he said. “This was psychologically very difficult for me because I went from winning to really struggling. We had like two minutes left. We didn’t know what we were doing.”
With both kings in danger, the underdeveloped Kaidanov found the subtle defense of retreating his one developed piece on move 32. “…Rg8! Wow! That was quite a move,” Ramirez said. The point was that the rook on a8 cannot be captured due to 33…Qe3+ 34. Kh1 (34. Rf2 Rf8) 34…Qg3 35. Rg1 (35. Bh3 Rxa8) 35…Qxh4#. In all variations, the wandering white queen is suddenly out of bounds.
But after the time scramble resourcefulness, Kaidanov placed his king on the light square e4 and fell victim to an advancing a-pawn. Scrambling to get his rook back again, this time he was met with a skewer on the long diagonal. Ramirez was shocked at the turn of events, which saw him go from groveling for a draw to simply winning. After starting with two wins and two draws and sharing the early lead, Kaidanov has lost his last three.
Chasing Kamsky and Nakamura with 4/7 are Shulman and GMs Alex Lenderman and Alex Onischuk, who also drew today. Onischuk received one of the biggest surprises of the tournament when his former student, GM Ray Robson, uncorked the implausible Belgrade Gambit. Onischuk played the only move he knew against it, 5…Be7. He admitted that his theoretical knowledge ended there, as his position was super solid. “The position was equal all the time, but he still tried to torture me,” Onischuk said. Asked if he would now learn more about the opening, he continued, “If I play against some 2300-player, I’ll have to come up with something else.”
Lenderman kept his unbeaten streak alive by holding the draw in mixed battle against GM Yasser Seirawan. “It was one of the strangest games I ever played,” Lenderman said. “It was unclear all the time. I thought I was better with initiative or attack, but after a turn of events, I was in a precarious endgame. But then without an obvious mistake from him, I was playing for a win.”
Seirawan guessed that he should have made better use of his kingside pawn phalanx. After losing his first three games, Seirawan, a four-time champion, has now won 2.5 out of his last four.
GM Varuzhan Akobian again jettisoned his favorite French Defense but used the Caro-Kann to eventually win a knight-and-pawn ending against GM Robert Hess.
FM Alisa Melekhina won her second game in a row to earn a plus score. She sits on 3.5/6 after winning against the luckless WGM Camilla Baginskaite. Melekhina already has more than twice the number of points she earned in seven rounds last year. “I didn’t expect Alisa to play so aggressively with such theoretical stuff,” Baginskaite said afterward.
Melekhina repeated her Moscow System that she previously used against Krush, but this time she offered her two center pawns to open the game quickly. “I’m not sure it’s objectively the best thing to do, but practically it is,” Melekhina said of her bellicosity. The fork 24. Qf3 pressured her opponent sufficiently to make a catastrophic error, dropping a knight. “I didn’t want to get so hopeful because the other day against Alena Kats I was up the exchange and four pawns and she fought back so hard.”
In other women’s games, WGM Tatev Abrahamyan bravely walked her king up the board in beating WGM Sabina Foisor. WIM Viktorija Ni got back to an even score by using her extra rook to eventually overpower WFM Alena Kats’s bishop.
by noreply@blogger.com (Susan Polgar) at May 16, 2012 02:03 PM

"Four to one odds? I'd put my money on Gelfand in a split second," said British chess grandmaster and coach Nigel Short of Israeli grandmaster Boris Gelfand.
And Short, himself a former competitor for the world title against the legendary Garry Kasparov, is not alone. While the bookies favor incumbent world champion Viswanathan Anand of India, Short's opinion seems to be the prevailing one in the press room of the World Chess Championship in Moscow.
With a third of the match over - four games so far - Gelfand has won the admiration of his fellow players and of his opponent. It is clear that Gelfand has not only done his homework, but that he is determined as well. He does not play like an underdog, as might be expected. Including Tuesday, he has drawn four times - twice playing black.
"Four draws. The match is just developing. We are just probing each other," Anand said at a press conference after the game.
Anand is one of the most brilliant people ever to master the game of chess, and every player at the world-class level, including all the past world champions - Kasparov and Anatoly Karpov among them - has felt the power of his game.
But Gelfand is holding his own. He surprised his opponent in the first game, winning himself a preferred spot. The game ended in a draw only because time ran out. In the second game, Anand had to be extremely precise in order to avoid giving Gelfand an opening. That game also ended in a draw. In Game 3, Gelfand's opponent was pressed for time - itself a rare occurrence - and couldn't find a way to win, thanks to an innovation by Gelfand that made the Tiger of Madras sink deeply into thought.
Tuesday's game started as a repeat of Game 2 with a Slav defense, until Gelfand deviated, leading to a flurry of exchanges. Gelfand had a slight advantage but did not risk stretching himself too far. He tried advancing his bishop but Anand correctly countered.
After four draws, the two seem to be evenly matched, regardless of who is labeled underdog or defending champion.
Source: http://www.haaretz.com
by noreply@blogger.com (Susan Polgar) at May 16, 2012 01:58 PM

by noreply@blogger.com (Susan Polgar) at May 16, 2012 01:48 PM

by noreply@blogger.com (Susan Polgar) at May 16, 2012 01:43 PM
MANILA, Philippines – Filipino Grandmaster (GM) Wesley So lived up to his billing as Asia's No. 1 blitz chess player after winning the 11th Asian Continental Individual Chess Championships Blitz competition over the weekend in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
He went undefeated en route to another successful victory in the Blitz competition.
The Philippines’ top rated GM scored 6 wins and 3 draws with a total of 7.5 points against seven GMs and two International masters (IMs) to clinch first place.
GM Nguyen Ngoc Truong Son and IM Nguyen Van Huy of Vietnam and GM Ding Liren of China finished second to fourth placers with 7.0 points each.
Other Filipino woodpushers who participated in the Blitz chess competition of the Asian chess meet are:
• GM Mark Paragua (6.0 pts., 10th place)
• GM Oliver Barbosa (5.5 pts., 22nd place)
• GM John Paul Gomez (5.0 pts., 29th place)
• GM Darwin Laylo (4.5 pts., 35th place)
• GM Eugene Torre (4.5 pts., 37th place)
• IM Jan Emmanuel Garcia (4.0 pts., 40th place)
"Blitz is a very exciting form of chess, with every player getting a mere 5 minutes to complete the game. This somehow leveled the playing field, resulting in a high rate of upsets," said former Olympian GM Jayson Gonzales, Executive Director of the National Chess Federation of the Philippines (NCFP). – By Marlon Bernardino
by noreply@blogger.com (Susan Polgar) at May 16, 2012 05:56 AM

For more information on the tournament please contact the organisers from the official website.
15 titled players (8 grandmasters!) have already confirmed their participation! Will GM Yrjö Rantanen be able to defend his title?
Photo courtesy of the Heart of Finland organisers, Chessdom and Anna Rudolf.
by noreply@blogger.com (Susan Polgar) at May 16, 2012 05:27 AM

by noreply@blogger.com (Susan Polgar) at May 16, 2012 05:17 AM

| 1. | Caruana, Fabiano | g | ITA | 2770 | * | ½ | 1 | ½ | 1 | ½ | . | 1 | 4½ |
| 2. | Leko, Peter | g | HUN | 2723 | ½ | * | ½ | . | ½ | 1 | ½ | 1 | 4 |
| 3. | Grandelius, Nils | g | SWE | 2556 | 0 | ½ | * | ½ | ½ | 1 | 1 | . | 3½ |
| 4-5. | Li, Chao | g | CHN | 2703 | ½ | . | ½ | * | ½ | ½ | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| 4-5. | Giri, Anish | g | NED | 2693 | 0 | ½ | ½ | ½ | * | . | ½ | 1 | 3 |
| 6-8. | Berg, Emanuel | g | SWE | 2587 | ½ | 0 | 0 | ½ | . | * | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| 6-8. | Hector, Jonny | g | SWE | 2560 | . | ½ | 0 | 0 | ½ | 0 | * | 1 | 2 |
| 6-8. | Tikkanen, Hans | g | SWE | 2566 | 0 | 0 | . | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | * | 2 |
by noreply@blogger.com (Susan Polgar) at May 15, 2012 07:57 PM
| 1. | Ivanchuk, Vassily | g | UKR | 2764 | 6½ |
| 2. | Nepomniachtchi, Ian | g | RUS | 2716 | 5½ |
| 3. | Dominguez Perez, Leinier | g | CUB | 2725 | 5½ |
| 4. | Potkin, Vladimir | g | RUS | 2642 | 4½ |
| 5. | Quesada Perez, Yuniesky | g | CUB | 2625 | 4 |
| 6. | Laznicka, Viktor | g | CZE | 2693 | 4 |
by noreply@blogger.com (Susan Polgar) at May 15, 2012 07:53 PM

Turin (Italy), 28 May 2012
Teaching chess at school may significantly improve pupils’ mathematics learning abilities, according to a study by INVALSI (the Italian National Institute for the Evaluation of the Education System) conducted as part of a controlled research project involving some 2,000 8-and 9-year-old children attending a sample of primary schools throughout Italy.
The SAM research project investigating the effects of learning to play chess on maths skills, developed by academic staff members Gianluca Argentin (Milan-Bicocca University), Alberto Martini (University of East Piedmont) and Barbara Romano (University of Pennsylvania), is the most recent in a series of studies on the potential advantages of chess in education promoted and conducted by the Piedmont Regional Committee of the Italian Chess Federation, presided over by Dr. Roberto Rivello, funded by Piedmont Regional Council and Compagnia di San Paolo.
Their findings have now been brought together and published by Prof. Roberto Trinchero from the University of Turin and will be the subject of a conference on 28 May 2012 at the Piedmont Region’s “Centro Incontri” congress centre in Turin.
The conference, which is open to the public, will mainly address primary and secondary-school teachers and will also discuss the possible implications of the European Parliament’s recent declaration on the introduction of the “Chess in School” programme in the educational systems of the European Union.
Chess has been part of the curriculum in schools in Piedmont for some time now. Initially only implemented in the city of Turin, under an initiative pioneered by the renowned Turin Chess Club, the project was subsequently extended to the rest of the region as a positive consequence of the Chess Olympiad 2006 held in Turin.
Each year approximately 20,000 state school pupils aged between 6 and 19 from more than 1,000 classes at 300 schools are included in the programme and Federation instructors provide a total of 12,000 hours of lessons during school hours.
Lessons are based on teaching protocols issued by the Piedmont Regional Committee of the Italian Chess Federation which, coordinated by Alessandro Dominici and working closely in partnership with the competent bodies of the Italian Chess Federation and the Italian National Olympic Committee (CONI), has also organised numerous training courses for instructors and teachers at state schools, awarding diplomas to 380 new Federation instructors and teachers. The figures are encouraging, but we still have a long way to go.
Representatives from the most important organisations around the world involved in teaching chess at school will take part in the conference, also via video-conference.
It will be broadcast live on internet, with simultaneous translation into English. This event has been conceived as the natural continuation of the International conference “Chess: a game to grow up with” that was held in Turin in 2009, during which speakers from four continents discussed the advantages and positive effects of the various initiatives and methods of teaching chess at school.
For full details please visit www.piemontescacchi.org
by noreply@blogger.com (Susan Polgar) at May 15, 2012 03:44 PM

The International Open Chess Tournament Albena 2012 will take place from 26th May to 3rd June at the Albena Sports Hall, in Albena, Bulgaria.
The 9-round Swiss open is organized by the Bulgarian Chess Federation, Chess Club “Dobrich – Albena” and Albena JSCo.
Albena is one of the most popular resorts on the Bulgarian Black Sea.
It is located 11 km south of Balchik and 30 km north of Varna – the sea capital of Bulgaria. Albena holds a “Blue Flag” certificate for its ecologically clean sea, beach and area. The soft sandy beach of Albena is more than 3.5 km long and up to 150 m wide.
The resort is located close to Baltata national reserve, thus providing a unique combination of forest and sea. Albena offers something for everyone due to its variety of attractions, water sports and recreational activities.
The average summer temperature is 28°С, and the average temperature of the crystal clear sea is 25°С.
The prize fund amounts to 40.000 EUR. For prizes distribution visit the official website.
by noreply@blogger.com (Susan Polgar) at May 15, 2012 03:39 PM

Chess Evolution series are having a Maxi Bundle day, offering ONLY today all printed editions at 50% discount.
The offer is during the next 24 hours and includes free shipping to any point in the world.
See the full offer of the Maxi Bundle here
Chess Evolution is the brand that encapsules the highest rated authors on the chess books market. The team is headed by GM Arkadij Naiditsch, while articles and contributions are by GM Etienne Bacrot, GM Sebastien Maze, GM Kamil Miton, GM Borki Predojevic, GM Ivan Sokolov, GM Baadur Jobava, etc.
The books by Chess Evolution come out every 2 months and include 400 pages of quality chess research, analysis, novelties, endgames, and lot’s of chess fun.
With the Chess Evolution Maxi Bundle you receive ALL six editions printed so far – March 2011, May 2011, July 2011, September 2011, November 2011, and January 2012 – all for a super discount of 50% and free shipping!
For more packages visit the Chessdom Chess Shop.
Chess Evolution is the brand that encapsules the highest rated authors on the chess books market. The team is headed by GM Arkadij Naiditsch, permanent member of the 2700 club, while article and contributions are by GM Etienne Bacrot, GM Sebastien Maze, GM Kamil Miton, GM Borki Predojevic, GM Ivan Sokolov, GM Baadur Jobava, etc.
The books by Chess Evolution come out every 2 months and include 400 pages of quality chess research, analysis, novelties, endgames, and lot’s of chess fun.
With the Chess Evolution Maxi Bundle you receive ALL six editions printed so far – March 2011, May 2011, July 2011, September 2011, November 2011, and January 2011 – all for a super discount of 50% and free shipping!
by noreply@blogger.com (Susan Polgar) at May 15, 2012 03:37 PM
Live chess broadcast powered by ChessBomb and Chessdom
by noreply@blogger.com (Susan Polgar) at May 15, 2012 10:55 AM
by noreply@blogger.com (Susan Polgar) at May 15, 2012 10:50 AM

If you will be in New Orleans long enough to experience some of the wonderful culture that the city has to offer, may we suggest some of the following tours:
by noreply@blogger.com (Susan Polgar) at May 15, 2012 07:42 AM
Filatov: "Chess is a unique tool for promoting the country's culture"
May 14, 2012
Alexei Dospekhov, Kommersant
Last Thursday the State Tretyakov Gallery hosted the opening of the main chess event of the season: the match for the world title between Viswanathan Anand and Boris Gelfand. The initiator of this duel in Moscow and its main sponsor, Andrei Filatov, one of the shareholders of the N-Trans Group, told Kommersant correspondent Alexei Dospekhov why he decided to invest in chess, in what ways it’s going to change the economy, and how it’s linked to Russian art.
I am, of course, primarily interested in your motivation. Why are you financing the match for the world chess champion title? Is it a contribution to your image, a desire to help the sport that you were seriously involved in as a youth?
A country that is fighting for all the major international events – the APEC Summit, the Olympics, World Cup, Universiade – simply cannot miss a competition in which it was once one of the main symbols. Boris Gelfand, my student friend, when he won the Candidates Tournament in Kazan last year, told me that the venue of the match had not yet been determined and that there were different rumors about whether it would go to India or somewhere else… It became clear that Moscow hadn’t applied. I thought about it and decided we needed to try. If Moscow’s bid won, the country would get a serious competition that hadn’t been held in modern Russia. Then later this themeevolved from the perspective of the current status of chess, the new chess economy, the main points on which it can be based.
And what are the points?
The first big question was the return to state funding of chess. The match will be held at an iconic museum. Why? You know that Viswanathan Anand is a national symbol of India and an idol who, when he won the title, was met at the airport by 50,000 people, more than Yuri Gagarin in 1961. His match with Gelfand will be followed by a huge country, hundreds of millions of people. Holding such tournaments can attract the attention of millions of people, promote the culture of its city, its country, improve its image and attract tourists, increase interest in our art. Chess is a unique and cost-effective tool for promoting the country, culture and ideas, and I’d like to believe that the state will see that.
And, of course, it’s important that the match will awaken an interest in chess inside Russia. Children will start to play it.
The government may itself enter this sphere as an investor and hold a tournament, for example at the Battle of Stalingrad Museum. Then the whole world will learn that this battle took place: as sad as it may be, many do not know and do not remember it.
Good, that’s the first point. And the next?
I am confident that this is a big new economy for the tourist and museum business. Some cities improved their image so much with the help of international chess tournaments that they eventually received substantial financial dividends. Another point is the very history of the museum. We specially found the data: in Russia, the number of people who visited the museum in the past year was 81 million. This is an incredible figure, when you get down to it. If our museums develop their own brands, and if they draw attention, that means there will be an interest in our art in general, in our culture.
You really think that Russian and Soviet art is something that’s undervalued?
Of course! Not a single country experienced more serious upheavals in the twentieth century than Russia: the war with Japan, the revolutions of 1905 and 1917, World War I, the Civil War, the Great Patriotic War, famine, repression… all the experiences, these incredible emotions, are visible in the works of Russian artists. Certainly French Impressionism is beautiful. But when Russian Impressionists depict life, there is a different intensity of emotions. Think of “Bathing of a Red Horse”by Petrov-Vodkin. Or Laktionov’s “Letter from the Front” at the Tretyakov Gallery.
The development of museum brands is, in my opinion, mandatory, including in terms of drawing money to the country. The Louvre makes a billion a year. And the idea to promote them through an international competition seems very promising. As far as I know, a tournament is being planned for a museum in Liverpool…
Do you, as a pioneer, already have successors?
Rather, I am a successor. Do you know that this idea was already realized? And do you know by whom? Stalin. In 1935 a tournament was held at the Pushkin Museum. The Soviet government demonstrated to the world that the Soviet Union had not sold off Russian cultural heritage.
Again, I very much hope that we will make a breakthrough. That this event, the entire Russian art market will grow. What if weattract investors from Asia? Suddenly a picture from the match so touches the heart of some billionaire from India that he says, “I dream of having that Shishkin!” He’s never seen such woods as in those paintings—the Russian forest!
It’s hard to believe that you weren’t thinking about yourself.
No, of course I was thinking about myself. Who was I before the match? For the most part, an ordinary entrepreneur.And then The Times and Kommersant are asking me for interviews… For many entrepreneurs this may be some kind of example. We have thousands of wealthy people. And if those wealthy people did the same, we would be living in a different country. And society’s attitude towards entrepreneurs would change.
Besides the Tretyakov Gallery, did you have other options?
We thought about the Pushkin Museum––it’s marking its centennial this year. But we settled on the Tretyakov Gallery. It is this museum that holds Russian riches that were created in the twentieth century but of which the world knows little. For example, the artistic symbol of the match is Viktor Popkov’s painting, “The Team Is Resting,” which depicts workers playing chess. The artist Popkov, unfortunately, is not widely known. And he was the only one of our painters to win the Paris Biennale. He is the only artist whose student work was bought by our best museums during his lifetime. That’s genius.
I take it that this match won’t be a one-time event for you?
Let’s see what happens with this. But, I must admit, there are already other plans. For example, to organize a major French-Russian tournament, the Alexander Alekhine Memorial.
What, in the end, was the budget for the match? I’ve heard the figure is about $5 million. Is that true?
Alas, we capped it at that mark.
People from the chess community told me that you might become a candidate for the post of the head of the RCF Supervisory Council in the event that ArkadyDvorkovich for some reason leaves. Is this true? Do you have such ambitions?
I have no such ambitions. And a second point: it seems to me that the very model that is now used in the RCF, and in other federations, with boards of trustees isn’t right. There should be normal elections for the heads of the organizations, as there were before. The whole complex system needs to be simplified, to make the Federation a clear, democratic institution.
You admitted that you are still friends with Boris Gelfand. You’re not afraid that because of your friendshipViswanathanAnand, the world champion, will find himself in an awkward position in Moscow?
Our mission is to ensure a worthy organization of the match, not the victory of a particular chess player. And to make sure that no one during the match has any kind of advantages over his opponent, an honest competition will be held. During the match, I have no right to show any kind of sympathies or preference. To be honest, this is hard, but I promise that I will stick to this line.
Source: http://indrus.in
by noreply@blogger.com (Susan Polgar) at May 15, 2012 05:43 AM

by noreply@blogger.com (Susan Polgar) at May 15, 2012 05:37 AM

The third game of the World Chess Championship in Moscow ended in a draw after a dramatic battle which ended only after 37 moves and four hours play.
Anand, playing with the first move, tried to take Gelfand by surprise with a rare third move designed to neutralise Gelfand's favourite Grunfeld Defence.
By move 12 it seemed that Anand would be launching a serious attack, as he sought to open up a file near Gelfand's king.
Superbly prepared
However, Gelfand had come superbly prepared and averaged just 35 seconds for each of his first 15 moves.
The Israeli challenger chose a reply which was reputed to lead to trouble for Black, and Anand began burning up time trying to work out why Gelfand was playing such a supposedly dubious line so quickly and confidently.
Finally, Anand decided to hide his king in the corner, away from Gelfand's attack, but the Israeli responded with his new idea — a pawn sacrifice to blow open a new diagonal towards Anand's king.
Despite falling well behind on the clock, Anand stayed calm, avoided many snares and liquidated to an endgame where his extra pawn counterbalanced Gelfand's continuing initiative.
“It is very complicated,” said Anand. “Black is trying to find compensation for his sacrificed pawn and White is trying to hold onto this pawn.”
On the 24th move Gelfand missed a clear method of balancing the game, and the Indian world champion gradually took control.
“I would have played the idea had I seen it,” admitted Gelfand.
“I was trying to take the pawn and equalise but I underestimated a few of his moves.”
The main danger for Anand in attempting to shepherd his extra pawn to victory was that he had only 10 minutes left for the final 10 moves of the time control.
On the 34th move disaster struck. Anand spent three minutes on his move but just as his hand left the piece he noticed a far more effective idea which would have won the game.
“I was just too late to see the [follow-up] 35.Rc4, which is winning,” said a clearly frustrated Anand.
He then rattled off a seven-move variation, leading to a position where he gained a new queen.
A relieved Gelfand took full advantage of his chance and invaded with his rooks, ending all danger.
Before playing his 38th move, Anand shrugged his shoulders and offered a draw, immediately accepted by Gelfand.
The draw leaves the score at 1.5-1.5 and is a significant psychological blow for the world champion, who threw everything into the game but was unable to apply the finishing touches and take the lead in the 12-game contest.
Nonetheless, a key member of the Anand camp remained upbeat saying: “Perhaps, it was a clearly winning position but the match is (now well and truly) on!”
Gelfand remained relaxed as usual, saying: “In principle, as many people know by now, I just play game by game.”
The fourth game will be played on Tuesday starting at 16.30 Indian time.
Ian Rogers is an Australian Grandmaster.
by noreply@blogger.com (Susan Polgar) at May 15, 2012 05:25 AM
by noreply@blogger.com (Online Chess) at May 15, 2012 03:58 AM

by noreply@blogger.com (Susan Polgar) at May 14, 2012 05:04 PM
The 11th Asian Continental Individual Women’s Chess Championship was held on 4-14th May 2012 at The First Hotel in Ho Chi Minh city, Vietnam.
In a spectacular finish WGM Irine Kharisma Sukandar from Indonesia regained the top position and won the title of the Asian chess champion.
Kharisma Sukandar led the standings throughout the whole tournament but in the 8th round Indian champion WGM Mary Ann Gomes won the direct match and grabbed the first place.
In the last round Caissa smiled back at the Indonesian player. Women Universiade champion WGM Tan Zhongyi beat Gomes while Kharisma Sukandar defeated IM Eesha Karavade.
Thus Irene Kharisma Sukandar took the gold medal with 7/9 points (and + 50 elo points), Mary Ann Gomes won the silver and Tan Zhongyi claimed bronze (both with 6.5/9 and on tie-break).
Replay the games from the Championship.
The tournament was conducted as a Swiss System competition of 9 rounds. Draw offer was not allowed before 30th move.
Final standings:
1. WGM Sukandar Irine Kharisma INA 2288 – 7
2. WGM Gomes Mary Ann IND 2378 – 6.5
3. WGM Tan Zhongyi CHN 2430 – 6.5
4. WGM Ding Yixin CHN 2353 – 6.5
5. Wang Jue CHN 2364 – 6.5
6. GM Zhao Xue CHN 2549 – 6
7. WGM Le Thanh Tu VIE 2313 – 5.5
8. IM Karavade Eesha IND 2353 – 5.5
9. WGM Padmini Rout IND 2345 – 5.5
10. WGM Guo Qi CHN 2360 – 5.5
11. WGM Nguyen Thi Thanh An VIE 2301 – 5
12. WIM Nakhbayeva Guliskhan KAZ 2309 – 5
13. IM Mohota Nisha IND 2321 – 5
14. WIM Yanjindulam Dulamsuren MGL 2214 – 5
15. IM Munguntuul Batkhuyag MGL 2451 – 5
16. WFM Zhai Mo CHN 2248 – 5
17. WGM Pham Le Thao Nguyen VIE 2390 – 5
18. IM Tania Sachdev IND 2417 – 5
19. Ni Shiqun CHN 2157 – 5
20. WGM Batchimeg Tuvshintugs MGL 2363 – 5
21. WFM Medina Warda Aulia INA 2172 – 5
by noreply@blogger.com (Susan Polgar) at May 14, 2012 04:56 PM